Apparently 'not' the ascension of the devil himself, nor an evil necromancer with the ability to raise armies from the dead.
But I didn't make the first bit up, Putin & the establishment
of Russia genuinely want to shield children from the ‘propaganda’ of homosexuality.
To claim that this doesn't constitute institutional homophobia is bizarre, for
it implies that the sexuality of these children is open to some manipulation,
or that homosexual people have a tendency to enjoy interfering with children in
some way. It all seems hinged upon an association of homosexuality with illegal
sexual perversions, or an assumption that homosexuality involves a choice –
both of which are ideas that are demonstrably false, and are also views typically held by homophobic people.
In fact, it has been noted that “many child molesters cannot be meaningfully described as homosexuals, heterosexuals, or bisexuals (in the usual sense of those terms) because they are not really capable of a relationship with an adult man or woman.” Not only that, in the majority of test cases the number of 'regressed' heterosexual men abusing children was greater than the number of 'regressed' homosexual men. Just wait until Putin hears wind of this and starts a hate-campaign against opposite-sex relationships. "We must prevent all this toxic heterosexual propaganda from reaching our delicate children's ears!"
It has also been shown that homosexuality can run in families, particularly along the maternal line, and research is being done to identify genetic information that could reveal something about the mystery of sexuality. In my opinion, all one needs to do to address the ‘nature or nurture’ debate over homosexuality is ask those who are homosexual what they consider the factor to be, and overwhelmingly one will receive the response that it is something they have felt from a very young age which feels essential to them as a person, not something they have appropriated as behaviour. It is my belief, along with many others, that a child who grows up in an exclusively heterosexual environment may turn out to be gay, bisexual or transgender.
In fact, it has been noted that “many child molesters cannot be meaningfully described as homosexuals, heterosexuals, or bisexuals (in the usual sense of those terms) because they are not really capable of a relationship with an adult man or woman.” Not only that, in the majority of test cases the number of 'regressed' heterosexual men abusing children was greater than the number of 'regressed' homosexual men. Just wait until Putin hears wind of this and starts a hate-campaign against opposite-sex relationships. "We must prevent all this toxic heterosexual propaganda from reaching our delicate children's ears!"
It has also been shown that homosexuality can run in families, particularly along the maternal line, and research is being done to identify genetic information that could reveal something about the mystery of sexuality. In my opinion, all one needs to do to address the ‘nature or nurture’ debate over homosexuality is ask those who are homosexual what they consider the factor to be, and overwhelmingly one will receive the response that it is something they have felt from a very young age which feels essential to them as a person, not something they have appropriated as behaviour. It is my belief, along with many others, that a child who grows up in an exclusively heterosexual environment may turn out to be gay, bisexual or transgender.
So, while one can
easily make jokes about two-man luges and caricature the country that facilitates
such vile infringements of justice, it might be better to properly discuss how a
country, with its multitudes of people, opinions and leaders can be diverted from
a path we so clearly see as wrong.
No comments:
Post a Comment